I
Prom D
1.2w notur
nineb binow
#
29
J.
that I did not make myself clear on this important distinction which has necessitated my troubling Your Excellency with a further letter on this subject.
4.
Proposals were at one time made that this Colony should take an active part in the repressive measures adopted on the Canton Waterways and if Your Excellency con -siders that any such co-operation would assist the objects of the Naval Patrol, I should esteem it a favour if you would afford me an opportunity of discussing the question with you.
5.
The matter at issue appears to me to divide itself into two very distinct parts:-
(a)
(b)
The obtaining of sufficient guarantees against further piratical outrages, and Indemnity for the "Sainam"
Bdes!
boedaniner T. Die bey Higgi
+
not made o
Har I annuð beðin ententh ontero
..
#
04.
I
BR dad ng Cachemen er blot nad on 26 DescRAD-
and no nie netu motinoms maso &
a mid bowelai
mike (ɔ) dzięk
og amoldealIdog
onurtbro el to **
ཐོག
FRY
-AS 30 wet od
at indegnere I bms
The first of these is by far the most difficult. In regard to the second the Central Government appears to have admitted responsibility, and the next step Would seem to be the issue of an Imperial Edict ordering the Viceroy to pay the amount claimed. Such an Edict would I presume be obeyed, and if it is not the final course would seem to be that proposed by Sir John Jordan on July 25th., viz.:- the taking of a material guarantee for payment.
I have etc.,
(Sa.) F. D. Lugard,
Governor,&C.
mukh vibrates eft no toorg reex) $
Uib elderebienoo
n bausitron est quodḥnok
ot édgro es molde voresĮV
*** ssunto omott to lawerb-
P.S. Since the above was written I have received
Your Excellency's despatch of December 26th.
enclosing copies of telegrams to and from
Peking of 25th and 26th. instant for which
I am much obliged.
(Sa.) F.D.L.
20 840 mg uit may 24 istria é sem
f blow wella of 193‡sí vm
Cons/font
W.A 412 Isri-bl
$.0.7
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.